![]() Unfortunately, that’s not how human languages work - words often have different meanings in different contexts. #BOUNDED CONTEXTS SOFTWARE#Since software doesn’t cope well with ambiguity, each Ubiquitous Language term should have exactly one meaning. Bounded Contextsĭefining a Ubiquitous Language is not a trivial task. The Ubiquitous Language becomes the model of the business domain implemented in code. ![]() ![]() Even the code should “speak” the Ubiquitous Language as well. All communication should be done in the Ubiquitous Language, and all documentation should be formulated in it. The Ubiquitous Language should be extensively used throughout the project. This language should resemble the business domain, its terms, entities, and processes. To allow for the fluent sharing of knowledge, DDD calls for cultivation of a shared, business-domain-oriented language: Ubiquitous Language. DDD aims to increase the success rates by bridging this collaboration and communication gap. In “Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software”, Eric Evans argues that poor collaboration between domain experts and software development teams causes many development efforts to fail. Crash Course in Domain-Driven Design and Bounded Contexts Not only is this heuristic flawed, but Bounded Contexts are the exact opposite of Microservices! To explain this point of view, I’ll start with a quick refresh of what Bounded Contexts are then I’ll discuss the relationship between Bounded Contexts and Microservices. ![]() I’ve always considered Domain-Driven Design’s Bounded Context as a guideline for defining the boundaries of Microservices. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |